Bell 205/212 grounding??

I’m hearing that all of the Bell 205/212 fleet is grounded effective this evening. Can anyone elaborate on what is going on and time frames??

Not really a good deal to lose the majority of your IA fleet in the middle of the season.

Also the FS will not let personnel fly on a type 1 helicopter, so basically all troop shuttles are shut down with this (for FS personnel).

I know BLM had a MOU with Calfire that allowed them to fly in their aircraft, but I do not think the FS has such an agreement, so they will not be able to pull crews off the hill.

2 Likes

The rumor I heard, involved the crash of a 212 in Canada last week where the blade delaminated or separated from the aircraft.

3 Likes

Yes Cal Fire and USFS grounded them. Has to do with a pin on rotor assembly There was a crash last week and a quick inspection revealed other pins with issues. More to come

6 Likes

Affirm. All CAL FIRE helicopters are grounded, excluding the FireHawk’s.

4 Likes

It’s affecting basically all 205s/212s for the Feds.(almost all the 205s have the 212 rotor system in them). I’m hearing it involves the pin for the TT straps.
No solution yet, but will possibly involve pulling blades on every helicopter. Possibility of an FAA AD coming out which would affect a fair number of public safety helicopters.

3 Likes

Seperate topic but someone made.mention of feds not allowing troop shuttle in cal fire hawks.only cal fire hawks? The angeles folks dont get in la county hawks? Just seems weird. Would.love to know more.

1 Like

Hawks are type 2’s.

It was after the Iron 44 crash to my understanding

2 Likes

Firehawks are Type 1 helicopters. 1000 gallons of water and better than 2500 LB payload. 700 is the minimum gallonage for Type 1 helicopters. Type 2 helicopters are a minimum of 300 gallons.

4 Likes

What would the typing have to do with feds banning troop shuttle?

Caught the other comment about the Iron Complex crash again what would that have to do with any of this? That happened in 2008 and cal fire just got state of the art s-71i aircraft.

2 Likes

Well it’s major thread drift, but I goes along with this I suppose.

The short answer is yes, No Forest Service employee who is not a check pilot should be flying in a Blackhawk/Firehawk. (I keep thinking of loopholes, for instance I know that LEO’s have flown in military Blackhawks for LEO operations, but lets exclude LEO’s). It’s a risk issue to them, and I think they don’t want to risk 20 people dying in 1 helicopter. They would rather only 10 people die in a helicopter crash.

The Forest Service use to use type 1 helicopters for troop movements. They had a type 1 helicopter rappel crew even out of the Los Padres. It was not unheard of to fly in the Boeing civilian certified Chinook.
Iron 44 crash happened in 2008 in the Shasta Trinity. The company had falsified records, performance numbers and I think weight and balance sheets. This lead to the crash which killed 9 people and injured 4 others. Basically since that day Fed’s have not been allowed to fly in a type 1 helicopter (except for a say a check pilot).
There is also a rule about restricted category aircraft and public use vs civilian use, which comes into play with all this, and makes things even more convoluted.
BLM changed their mind on some of this 5 or more years ago, and they contracted a type 1 helicopter with crew, and created an MOU with Calfire for their ships.

Basically the Forest Service has created rules that are much more restrictive than the federal regulations, some of this is good, and some of it in my opinion is bad, and they have put themselves into a box, that is not needed.

I’m sure there are some occasions where an IC or Divs jumps in an LA county Firehawk and takes a recon, but technically that is probably against the rules, unless they have an MOU, and I don’t think they do with LA County.

Its been a long time since I’ve worked for the FS and I didn’t work for them in aviation, so I don’t remember the exact policies. I just remember, No you can not get in a type 1 and no you can not get in a Calfire helicopter as a FS employee.

Some of that comes into play because of the restricted category/Public use vs Civilian aircraft use debate as well.
All aircraft are certified by the FAA in different categories. There are hoops and flight tests and structural tests that have to be completed to be allowed to say be a commercial airliner. Most aircraft that come to the market for commercial operations (ie helicopters) are certified in the standard category, where they have no restrictions on them. The Blackhawk, being a military aircraft was never sent through all the hoops with the FAA to be certified this way(although the military’s hoops were probably just a tough, but this is the government here, if it made sense, it wouldn’t be that way.) The large majority of the aircraft that come surplus from the military end up in the restricted category because of this. You aren’t going to be seeing anyone offering to fly you and your friends to Catalina on a Blackhawk, because the FAA says that’s not safe, because they don’t have the paperwork to prove its safe. These aircraft end up with type certificates that say they can be used for things like Long line/agriculture/firefighting etc. Not carrying passengers.
So how does LA County fly their crews in their Firehawks… Well they are not civilian aircraft technically, they are certified under “public use” aircraft, as are CalFires.
Public Use is a unique classification, because “technically” you don’t even have to have a pilots license to fly one. It’s basically a whole separate set of rules for government agencies. There pilots still have licenses and they still do maintenance the same as they would otherwise, but its a gray area and the Forest Service doesn’t like the risk assessment in the gray area. They actually threw a hissy fit when BLM went to a type 1 restricted category ship with crew.
I know in the past the FS was ok with declaring aircraft public use that were in the restricted category so they could carry crewmembers, but I don’t know when that changed, or if that was because of Iron 44.

So as if this isn’t a long enough answer. LA City runs AW139’s, that are a civilian certified aircraft. If I had a few million dollars I could go out and buy one and hire a pilot to fly me and all my friends wherever I wanted. Though I could probably technically go buy a new S-70 from Sikorsky, I would not be allowed to ride in it, unless I was a crucial crew member (aka no friends). So LA City’s ships are probably fine for the FS to fly in…except they are in the type 1 realm technically so once again excluded by the FS’s policy box.

Longs enough answer?? haha

16 Likes

Long answer and the most ridiculous reason for not allowing federal employees to fly in agency helos I have ever heard

2 Likes

This explains why Kern Copter 408 was grounded immediately by South Ops on the fire in Gorman earlier tonight, out of the blue.

2 Likes

CAL FIRE S71i’s are not a military prior use ship.They are built from scratch 'fire hawks". Same as the recent LACoFD new ships as is SND. Now Ventura and Santa Barbara County Fire recently received prior used S-60 black hawks. 3 for Ventura and 1 for Santa Barbara.

1 Like

CF Hawks are considered Type 2. None of them carry 1k gallons. Load calculations don’t allow.

Because of feds not allowing troop shuttles in type 1 birds.

They are listed as type 1s on the daily sit rep and are touted as carrying 1000 gallons.

1 Like

Sorry sir but your information is not correct. Any thing above 700 gallons is considered a type 1 helicopter. You can check at NWCG Standards for Wildland Fire Resource Typing, PMS 200. CAL FIRE purchased these S70i with the purpose of carrying 1000 gallons. Now there may be a day or two where at certain altitudes where carrying a little less than 1000 gallons would be necessary, but they meet NWCG types standard’s.

3 Likes

I could swallow the type/certificate argument but the we dont we only want smaller amounts of people to perish in helo crashes is ridiculous so we dont put our people in large helicopters. I appreciate the background and sorry for the hijack.

6 Likes

Regardless of opinion , there is a reason why things are the way they are; albeit convoluted at times. Industry is back on the upswing of seeking and offering standard category type 1 helicopters …. Realistically this has been the designation for limiting federal participation on type 1 helicopters … that and old policy from the Iron 44 fiasco.

The BLM has a Blackhawk program with Boise Helitack and all DOI employees are allowed to fly on it. This particular contract has had its fair share of for and against participation of feds on board again due to the designations the FAA place on the category of helicopter.

Nationally we should see policy switching back to allowing USDA employees to once again fly on the standard category type 1 helicopters.

The grounding of the bell medium fleet is an absolutely awesome call…. Preliminary information shared throughout the industry and random sampling after the crash put industry where we are now.

If it’s made by “ man “ it’s bound to fail at some point. Perception , versus reality , versus policy seems to be a bit of this threads tone… hopefully this has helped with some fact versus fiction perspective.

4 Likes

The Calfire and other agencies new hawks are still not a standard category civilian certified aircraft. Sikorsky has never sent the Blackhawk through the certification process with the FAA. They fly under the Public Use part of the regulations.

Additionally here is the typing from NWCG:

A Blackhawk/Firehawk is rated as a type 1 helicopter

4 Likes