CA-PNF-Walker??

Taken 5 minutes ago From 100 miles south, North of Auburn

3 Likes

reno%20radar

13:25 Reno radar…

https://www.wildfirelessons.net/orphans/viewincident?DocumentKey=48b5a759-d2a1-4d8f-8a82-088bdfe97935

Eagle Review

As of 1350 hrs.

The Eagle Fire entrapment site is abut 15 miles away through a wide variety of fuel and terrain features as well as a number of burn scars. While a very interesting topic for training that I have used a number of times including talking with 3 of the crew members involved. But I think there is very little chance this fire with get there. So probably not a topic for this thread IMHO.

1 Like

Watch for the wind shift at about 2000 UTC…

https://www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/GOES/sector_band.php?sat=G17&sector=psw&band=GEOCOLOR&length=96

1 Like

Looks like another fire south of the main fire on the fort sage camera.

There’s is another fire north of the Walker

From LACC Rec #1 @1544

1 Like

From the Peavine camera. Looks like the South East side of Dixie Mt.

2 Likes

That fire is also on Plumas called the Table Fire. CA-PNF-1356 at the base of Reconnaissance Peak

Modis shows heat on the south slope of Dixie mountain and plumas has a bunch of equipment committed to the Dixie fire.

http://www.alertwildfire.org/blmnv/index.html

Fort Sage Camera

Visual imagery to put it all in perspective…

(Gotta love the new GOES 17)

7 Likes

CIIMT4 assigned to Walker Fire. In brief at 1800 in Quincy.

3 Likes

Are they going to marry the two teams together or is team 4 completely taking it over? Just wondering if this is the first instance of running a fire with type 1 and type 2 team?

They have had Fed T1 and T2 teams assigned to the same incident as many times.

The question was are they going to have the type 1 team work with the type 2 team so the type 2 team members can work on their type 1 task books, so that the type 2 team can convert to a type 1 team. The idea has been floating around lately.

Yes, thank you for the clarification. That’s what I was wondering but you stated it better than I did. :grin:

As far as type III teams working with type I teams, it is my understanding from team meetings that that is only C & G. Not the entire team